Romsey‌ Citizens’‌ ‌Assembly‌

Romsey‌ Citizens’‌ ‌Assembly‌

The Democratic Society

  • 4. What did the assembly members think?
  • Annexes
  • Annex 4: Innovation in Democracy Programme Support & Funding
  • Building Capacity, Skills and Learning
  • Funding
  • Notes
  • Introduction

    The Romsey Citizens' Assembly was formed to discuss the future of Romsey Town Centre.
    Forty-two1 residents broadly reflecting the population of Romsey and the surrounding Parishes met over two weekends in November to discuss the issues and question experts before coming up with detailed recommendations to present to councillors. They were:

    ParticipantsParticipantsParticipants

    Trevor, Romsey

    Luke, Romsey

    Linda, Romsey

    Sharon, Romsey Extra

    Lily, Romsey

    Jim, Romsey

    Stuart, Romsey

    Viveca, Romsey Extra

    Aleksandra, Romsey

    Karena, Romsey Extra

    Lara, Romsey

    Julie, Romsey

    Kathryn, Ampfield

    Rory, Romsey

    Chris, Romsey Extra

    Rob, Romsey

    Jean, Wellow

    Cristeena, Romsey Extra

    Susan, Romsey

    Sarah, Romsey

    Rhiannon, Romsey Extra

    Rosie, Romsey

    Chris, Romsey Extra

    David, Romsey Extra

    Sally, Romsey

    Gemma, Romsey

    Steve, Romsey Extra

    Susan, Romsey

    Catherine, Romsey

    Nick, Romsey

    George, Romsey Extra

    Douglas, Romsey Extra

    Doreen, Romsey

    Kimberley, Romsey

    Paul, Nursling Rownhams

    Sarah, Romsey

    Tim, Romsey

    Andrew, Romsey

    Melissa Jane, Romsey

    Samantha, Romsey Extra

    Michael, Romsey

    Colin, Romsey

    Kirstie, Romsey

    This report sets out what the Citizens' Assembly did and what proposals they put to the council. We have sought to represent what people said and concluded as faithfully as possible without adding our own analysis or interpretation.

    Who was involved?

    Test Valley Borough Council

    Test Valley Borough Council2 commissioned the Citizens' Assembly for Romsey having been selected to participate in the Innovation in Democracy Programme. The Council has worked over a number of years to embed a culture of, and commitment to, place-based working that is at the heart of making well-informed decisions which reflect the needs of all communities in order to ensure not just those who shout the loudest are heard. This work forms one of the council's key strategic priorities and has led to the emergence of new partnerships forming at a community-based level such as Romsey Future. The council's most senior politicians and officers have supported the development of the citizens assembly and as a result, has invested significant resource from across the organisation to work with the Democratic Society and partners in co-designing the assembly.

    Romsey Future

    Romsey Future3 sets out a long-term vision for Romsey. It is an active partnership of many groups and organisations working together to build consensus and deliver on shared ambitions. Through Romsey Future, partners are able to deliver projects, to attract funding, and to guide future policies and strategies. The strategic ambitions for the south of town centre in Romsey were first identified through Romsey Future resulting from consultation and engagement with thousands of residents.

    The Democratic Society

    The Democratic Society4 (Demsoc) works for more and better democracy, where people and institutions have the desire, opportunity and confidence to participate together. They work to create opportunities for people to become involved in the decisions that affect their lives and for them to have the skills to do this effectively. Supporting governments, parliaments and any organisation that wants to involve citizens in decision making to be transparent, open and welcoming of participation. The Democratic Society ran the Citizens' Assembly - facilitating and designing the process by which the assembly members learned, considered and came to recommendations for the area around the Crosfield Hall and the Bus Station which delivers maximum benefit to Romsey. They also wrote this report.

    Sortition Foundation

    The Sortition Foundation5 promotes the use of sortition (random selection) in decision-making. They were responsible for recruiting people to take part in the Citizens' Assembly and introducing them to the process making sure they were comfortable to participate ahead of the first weekend. Their aim was to ensure the citizens' assembly was broadly representative of the local population.

    The Innovation Democracy Programme Support Contractors

    The Romsey Citizens' Assembly was supported by a range of organisations as part of the Innovation in Democracy Programme6 (see below). This included Close-Up Research & Film7, Involve8, mySociety9, The RSA10 and Renaisi11. Close-Up Research & Film have documented the process of the Romsey Citizens' Assembly through image and film, with a film about the programme being released shortly. Involve provided design and facilitation support and guidance throughout the process. mySociety have worked behind the scenes supporting the work of the panel using digital tools, as well as digitising this report in various formats. The RSA have supported the communications about the Romsey Citizens' Assembly and hosted peer learning events for the full cohort of programme councils. Finally, Renaisi have worked with the UK Government to evaluate the programme and its effectiveness in innovating local democracy.

    The Innovation in Democracy Programme

    Test Valley Borough Council was awarded funding and support from the UK Government's Innovation in Democracy Programme to hold this citizens' assembly. The Innovation in Democracy Programme (IiDP) is trialling innovative models of deliberative democracy to involve residents in local government decision-making. It is supporting three local authorities to open up a key policy decision to citizen deliberation, complemented by online engagement. IiDP is jointly delivered by the Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport and the Ministry of Housing, Communities, and Local Government. For more information on the support provided, please see Annex 1.

    Acknowledgements

    Thank you to everyone who was involved in making the Romsey Citizens' Assembly on the future of Romsey Town Centre happen, including assembly members, expert leads and contributors, facilitators, the support team, funders, advisory group members and contributors to evidence gathered ahead of the panel convening. Thank you also to the staff at the Royal British Legion, Romsey, for the warm smiles and great food.

    Executive summary

    The Romsey Citizens' Assembly brought together 40 randomly selected residents from Romsey and the surrounding Parishes during November to develop a set of recommendations for developing the area around the Crosfield Hall and the Bus Station in the South of the Town Centre to deliver maximum benefit to Romsey.

    The work of the Citizens' Assembly, and the recommendations within this report, will be presented informally to Test Valley Borough Council's Cabinet and the Romsey Future Partnership in January 2020 followed by a formal report to Cabinet in Spring 2020. Councillors will then use these recommendations to help them decide what to do in the short, medium and long-term to improve the south of the Town Centre area based on what the Citizens' Assembly has recommended.

    The Romsey Citizens' Assembly was asked to address a key question:

    How do we improve the area around Crosfield Hall and the Bus Station to deliver the maximum benefit to Romsey?

    In addressing the question, the Citizens' Assembly may also wish to consider the impact on:

    Meeting over two weekends, the Citizens' Assembly heard evidence, deliberated and made a set of proposals and recommendations to the council for achieving their vision for the South of the Town Centre.

    Assembly members voted on their key priority statements (proposals), using a ballot process. The ballot paper question was, ‘To what extent do you support or oppose the following proposals for improving the area around Crosfield Hall and the Bus Station to deliver the maximum benefit to Romsey?'.

    The results showed that all 12 proposals were well supported by Citizens' Assembly members, with 7 out of the 12 proposals receiving over 50% ‘strongly support' votes. Some proposals received opposition with ‘Green Town status by 2025' and ‘reduce the number of vehicles by half by 2025' receiving the most opposition altogether.

    12 priority statement proposals ranked in order of total support (support and strongly support votes combined). Those highlighted received over 50% ‘strongly support' and were further developed into recommendations for presentation to the council:

    Chart 1: Results of Day 4 ballot vote, shown in percentage %

    Chart 1: Results of Day 4 ballot vote, shown in percentage %

    On-going engagement

    Members of the Romsey Citizens' Assembly have been invited to stay engaged with the council to support the implementation of their proposals going forwards. The council offered to convene assembly members before Christmas for a celebration event to discuss the next steps. The council have already invited assembly members to present their report to Councillors in January 2020 at a meeting with Cabinet members. Formal consideration of the recommendations will be considered in Spring 2020 alongside the proposed masterplan for the South of the Town Centre.

    Members of the Citizens' Assembly will also be invited and encouraged to stay involved and play an active role in the wider Romsey Future network.

    1. How the Citizens' Assembly was created

    In September, letters were sent to 10,000 randomly selected households, inviting people aged 16 and over, to register their interest in becoming a Citizens' Assembly member.

    The members of the Citizens' Assembly were recruited by The Sortition Foundation on behalf of The Democratic Society through a civic lottery sent to 10,000 postal points in Romsey and the surrounding Parishes. Households which received the invitation were able to register their interest in participating. The Sortition Foundation then randomly selected 50 individuals from the pool of responses who broadly represented a cross-section of Romsey's demographic profile in terms of age, gender, geography, occupation, travel frequency and ethnicity.

    Figure 1: Invite package sent to 10,000 households

    A final total of 42 assembly members completed the two weekends.

    Assembly members were given £150 at the end of each weekend (£300 in total), to incentivise, retain and recognise their commitment and thank them for their involvement. We also covered the cost of childcare, care for those who had caregiving needs and all travel expenses.

    A full on-boarding and induction process was carried out by The Sortition Foundation on behalf of The Democratic Society to ensure that assembly members experienced a safe, supportive and caring environment. The Democratic Society takes safeguarding, support and care responsibilities seriously and provided extra support to young people under the age of 18 and vulnerable adults to make sure individuals could participate equitably.

    Most communication was carried out with assembly members by email and phone. However, for those without email, contact was made via post.

    Test Valley Borough Council worked with officers from The Sortition Foundation and The Democratic Society to create and issue every panel member with an information handbook - which gave full information about the process including frequently asked questions.

    1.1 The demographic profile of the Citizens' Assembly

    The Citizens' Assembly was recruited to form a ‘mini-public' version of the demographics of Romsey and the surrounding Parishes. The assembly members were selected against 7 categories; gender, age, geography, occupation, travel frequency and ethnicity.

    The pie charts below display the demographic profiles of the people Test Valley Borough Council serves using the latest available Census data. The Sortition Foundation were able to recruit assembly members to be broadly representative of the community by matching them to the demographics of the area.

    Chart 2: Comparison of the demographic profile of the Citizens' Assembly and Romsey

    _

    _

    1.2 The role of the Citizens' Assembly Advisory Group

    An independent advisory group was formed to work with Test Valley Borough Council and The Democratic Society in agreeing the overall shape of the evidence and appropriate content. Their specific tasks were:

    The members of the Advisory Group were:

    1.3 How other residents contributed

    Prior to the Citizens' Assembly, residents were invited to share their views about what they like and what they think could be improved in Romsey by completing an online survey or attending one of the lived experience workshops. The purpose of which was to enable the assembly to hear a range of views from across the town.

    Four lived experience workshops were held with; young people, older people, disabled people and low-income groups. mySociety attended these workshops and collated the resident's comments to create discussion maps using a mind map software called Coggle12.

    Representatives from the workshops also had the opportunity to present their views to the assembly members on day one. In addition, a survey was completed with 19 Bus Station users and the themes of their responses can be found in the discussion map in Annex 1.

    Figure 1: Discussion map of Crossfield Hall users

    The discussion maps from all the workshops and bus the survey can be found in Annex 1.

    1.4 Sharing evidence

    Evidence was presented by a range of experts during each of the four days, alongside conversations with a number of local representatives from community groups, service providers and organisations sharing their experiences.

    Evidence from expert presenters was recorded by Test Valley Borough Council's communications team and will be available online for viewing on the Romsey Future website: https://www.romseyfuture.org.uk/citizens-assembly

    1.5 Sharing process; observers

    Observers were present throughout both weekends and were able to hear the evidence giving and observe the process in action. They were not allowed to listen in to table discussions or approach members of the Citizens' Assembly in order to prevent interruption or undue influence. Observers were both individuals and organisations with an interest in the assembly question and/or process of running a citizens' assembly. There was a range of observers, who came from the local area and from national organisations.

    2. How the citizens' assembly worked

    The Romsey Citizens' Assembly met over two weekends (9th & 10th and 23 & 24th November 2019) enabling assembly members to take part in over 24 hours of learning, deliberation and decision-making. The process was designed by The Democratic Society, with the support and input from Test Valley Borough Council officers, the advisory group and Involve.

    The work of the Citizens' Assembly

    The Romsey Citizens' Assembly was made up of 50 residents, who together represented a typical profile of residents from the area, over 16 years old. They were recruited as a result of a civic lottery in which 10,000 invitations were sent out to households across the area.

    They met together for four whole days, over two weekends in November 2019, at the Royal British Legion Club in Romsey town centre.

    The process was designed by The Democratic Society and Involve, with input from an advisory group and Council officers. Each session was led by two experienced lead facilitators who managed the overall event: Mel Stevens (Democratic Society) and Chris Tuke (Democratic Society Associate).

    Six tables had independent facilitators, with the addition of some council staff, who had been trained in facilitation techniques by Involve ahead of the first Citizens' Assembly weekend. The table facilitator's role was to stimulate thinking and dialogue and help record what was being discussed. They would then support the group to work up ideas into recommendations.

    Assembly members sat according to a seating plan that was changed on each of the four days. This was to ensure they heard and engaged with a variety of views and perspectives from other Assembly members and to ensure a mix of demographics at the tables.

    A range of expert witnesses were engaged and briefed on the methods and purpose of the assembly and spoke as expert witnesses. They presented relevant information and background to the assembly over the course of the two weekends, to help groups with their deliberations. Experts were also available to answer questions during group discussions.

    In addition to the expert evidence, the Citizens' Assembly was informed about pre-event engagement with the wider community, notably views of children and young people, and residents' views on parts of the town. Data and feedback were displayed on the walls of the venue, for assembly members to look at during breaks.

    A Romsey that works: in the themes of People, Planet, Businesses and Communities

    The themes of people, planet, business and community were used as a framework for the assembly to enable them to explore the question from multiple perspectives. Both weekends were designed so that a range of outputs resulting from each stage of deliberation could feed into the work of the Citizens' Assembly in reaching a set of recommendations for the council.

    Weekend one - Saturday 9th and 10th November - Day 1 & 2

    The first weekend focused on the bigger question of how to improve a place and what does maximum benefit mean? The aim was to hear from a range of experts across a range of topics. This was to help explore the issues as Assembly members and provide the space to talk about what is most important when seeking to improve a place. This identified the top line principles and priorities that were developed the following weekend.

    Table 1: Weekend one inputs and outputs

    The inputsThe outputs
    • Key themes highlighted
    • Key principles explored
    • Panel speakers
    • Lived experience speakers
    • Conversation guidelines
    • Unanswered questions for all speakers
    • Assembly description of what Romsey is currently like
    • 12 key outcomes for Business
    • 12 key outcomes for Planet
    • 12 key outcomes for People
    • 12 key outcomes for Community
    • 12 priority statements (3 per theme)
    • ‘Park’ post-its

    Weekend two - Saturday 23rd and 24th November - Day 3 & 4 overview

    The aim was to develop the ideas and ambitions agreed the previous weekend and apply to Romsey more specifically, in order to address the stated challenge of the Citizens' Assembly. This was a collaborative process with an added focus to deliver the maximum benefit for Romsey residents.

    The expert witnesses presented information about opportunities in Romsey and explored what has been in development through the master planning process so far. By the end of the weekend the assembly produced recommendations for improving the area around the Crosfield Hall and Bus Station and to deliver the maximum benefits.

    Table 2: Weekend two inputs and outputs

    The inputsThe outputs
    • Conversation guidelines
    • 12 key outcomes for Business
    • 12 key outcomes for Planet
    • 12 key outcomes for People
    • 12 key outcomes for Community
    • 12 priority statements (3 per theme)
    • Walk and talk evidence sessions
    • Expertise from Nexus and Test Valley Borough Council
    • 12 priority statement proposal posters
    • Voting results showing levels of support
    • support priority statement proposals
    • Recommendations presented to the council

    2.1 Day 1: A Romsey that works for Business and Planet

    The morning involved an introduction to the Citizens' Assembly of Conversation Guidelines, with any additions, followed by agreement from attendees. There was a focus on what has been developed already at the Council and how the Assembly connects to it, e.g. Romsey Future Partnership. Cllr. Adams-King was delighted to open the Citizens' Assembly on behalf of the council.

    Welcome to the Citizens' Assembly

    Councillor Adams-King welcomed Assembly Members to the Citizens' Assembly and thanked them for taking the time out of their lives to take part. He shared aspirations that the council and Romsey Future have to involve communities.

    Hearing from lived experience experts

    There was a table exercise to explore what Romsey area is like. Three things that are good and three things that are not so good were fed back to the Assembly from each table. The table groups then rotated around ‘zones' hearing from ‘lived experience' presenters

    After lunch, the first panel presented as expert witnesses:

    BUSINESS, ENTERPRISE & TECHNOLOGY PANEL

    The second panel presented as expert witnesses:

    PLANET PANEL (environment, habitat, heritage)

    Following each presentation, participants were asked to share key points and questions, prioritising one question to ask speakers during the Q and A.

    Panel speakers Carousel - Each speaker then had about 5 mins at a table, answering questions, exploring in more detail things the table wanted to know.

    Success for Romsey in Business and Planet (table exercise)

    The assembly then worked on their table exercise, to build a vision for the future of Romsey regarding Business and Planet. The aim was for tables to arrive at two lists of outcomes they would like to achieve (one list per theme), and then agreed 2 key outcomes they would prioritise for each list created. Tables then fed back briefly to the group.

    2.2 Day 2: A Romsey that works for People and Communities

    The first panel presented as expert witnesses:

    PEOPLE PANEL (wellbeing and health)

    There was a break and reflection for Remembrance Day.

    The second panel presented as expert witnesses:

    COMMUNITY PANEL (civic Society and volunteering)

    Panel speakers Carousel - Each speaker then had about 5 mins at a table, answering questions, exploring in more detail things the table wanted to know. Then it was lunch.

    Success for Romsey in People and Community (table exercise)

    The Assembly then worked on their table exercise, to build a vision for the future of Romsey regarding People and Community. The aim was for tables to arrive at two lists of outcomes they would like to achieve (one list per theme), and then agreed 2 key outcomes they would prioritise for each list created. Tables then fed back briefly to the group.

    The next session was called‘Free Roaming Graffiti Artists' - working on the total 48 priorities from the assembly process so far. The 12 priorities for each theme of People, Planet, Businesses and Communities were displayed on four tables. Assembly members had time to ‘roam' around and add any thoughts by writing on the sheets of paper - this ensured that participants could comment on any of the key priorities that were being developed.

    The final session was then working in four groups, to sort through the additional comments, and to refine the 12 priorities per theme, into 3 prioritiesper theme.

    These 3 newly refined priority outcomes per theme were then presented back to the room by tables, with some of their reasoning behind it.

    Finally, assembly members were encouraged to write themselves a postcard reminder to help them remember what they thought was important from sessions 1 and 2 for reviewing at the second weekend.

    Any people, or topics, which members thought were missing could be raised by members with their table facilitators, to help address gaps for days 3 and 4.

    2.3 Day 3: Creating Proposals for the Council

    After a recap of the previous weekend from the lead facilitators, Romsey Citizens' Assembly were reminded of the aims and the timeline of how their recommendations would be shared with the Council. Assembly members were encouraged to play an active role in presenting their work as part of this process and were reminded about what had been agreed the previous weekend - the key outcomes and 12 priority statements.

    This weekend was aimed more directly at the assembly question and to further develop the 12 priority statements from weekend one.

    Focusing on the South of the Town Centre

    The first panel presented as expert witnesses:

    The Walk and Talk

    The assembly spent some time on location, looking at the key locations that have been discussed. There were four different locations with some of the experts there, to share their thoughts and insights. [10 mins chat at each location].

    Members had the 48 key successes to take on the tour if they wanted. Locations were:

    1. The Hundred (High Street)
    2. Crosfield Hall
    3. Bus Station and Fish Lake Stream
    4. The Marketplace.

    After lunch, the Assembly then focused on the final 12 priority outcome statements that were agreed at the first weekend. Zena Foale Banks - Nexus,presented how, as master planners, they review and test ideas in order to help the assembly think through a range of considerations for their top 12 priorities.

    Zena and Graham were then available for the rest of the afternoon, as the assembly explored how to determine what is needed to bring maximum value to a place, what is needed to make it a reality, or if it is a feasible option.

    The assembly began working on the first 6 of the 12 priority statements. This was done using a planning template, to draw everything together to make specific proposals, which would achieve the agreed priority outcome. There was one randomly allocated priority per table.

    After some time the table groups moved around the room, in order to have a short time to comment on the developed proposal for each of the other priority statements in progress.

    Each table then fed back to the wider group on the priority they had worked on, covering the first 6 proposals.

    2.4 Day 4: Final proposals for the Council

    The first main session of the day was for the Assembly work on the second 6 of the overall 12 priority statements. This was done using a planning template, to draw everything together to make specific proposals, which would achieve the agreed priority. There was one randomly allocated priority per table.

    After some time, the table groups moved around the room, in order to have a short time to comment on the developed proposal for each of the other priority statements in progress.

    Each table then fed back to the group on the final 6 proposals. This completed the Assembly's work on the 12 priority proposals.

    Voting on the 12 priority proposals

    The assembly members were given a brief time to remind themselves about the proposals, having contributed to all of them at some point, and then issued with ballot papers to vote on the following:

    ‘To what extent do you support or oppose the following proposals for improving the area around Crosfield Hall and the Bus Station to deliver the maximum benefit to Romsey?'

    Over lunch, Ballots were collected, and the results counted and then presented to the panel at the beginning of the afternoon. This enabled participants to see the strength of support against each of the proposal and also to see that there were some different opinions.

    Figure 2: Planning template

    The proposals that received the strongest levels of support (over 50% ‘strongly support' vote) were focused on for the next exercise, where the assembly was then invited to roam around the tables to add their views on whythey thought these were important and what impactthey would make.

    The table activity was then to work up a final presentation to the council representatives of the shortlisted proposals. A panel of officers from the council listened and responded to what they had heard and had an opportunity to ask a question. This panel comprised of:

    Due to the restrictions of Purdah, elected Councillors were unable to take part in this session.

    Roger Tetstall - CEX - final reflections

    The day ended with final reflections from Roger Tetstall, CEX Test Valley Borough Council. Council officers then inviting assembly members to a celebration event in December to talk more about their recommendations and to agree the next steps in how the council and its partners will review and implement the recommendations. This was well-received by assembly members.

    The lead facilitators thanked the group, there were final evaluations to complete and a group photo.

    None

    3. The results and recommendations

    A variety of outputs and results were created over the duration of the 4 days, each informing the next discussion and activity ending in the final recommendations to the council.

    3.1 Developing and refining

    The results are shown here, in the order that the Citizens' Assembly undertook the discussions and activities.

    On Day 1, assembly worked on their tables to talk about the current situation in Romsey Town Centre. This resulted in two lists of ‘great' and ‘not so great' for the Town Centre.

    Each of the 6 tables worked to identify the top 3 from each list - those bolded below.

    Table 3: Romsey Town Centre great and not so great list (top 3 from each table in bold)

    Great Not so great 
    • Crosfield Hall
    • Recycling
    • That there is some parking
    • The Petshop :)
    • Recycling facilities are useful but its position isn’t very helpful
    • The stream has potential to be an asset
    • Aldi
    • Recycling point next to Aldi
    • Crosfield Hall - great space to hire/for community events + provides town centre car parks - community asset central bus station/transport hub
    • The way out {of Romsey}
    • Food Festival
    • Beggars Fair
    • Lantern Parade
    • Well lit at night (I run at 5am!)
    • Pubs allow dogs
    • Facilities
    • Community involvement
    • Welcoming atmosphere in the centre
    • Good community feeling
    • History
    • Town has a defined centre/meeting space
    • Interesting historic town
    • A sense of history through the ages
    • Look of the town
    • Size of Romsey
    • How each space links together
    • Keep Crosfield Hall! (good facility)
    • Wide variety of shopping opportunities
    • Parks
    • Butcher! Baker! Hardware Shop! A lot of local independents
    • Market
    • Easy to get into nature
    • Parks and open spaces
    • Walking routes to villages + riverside + parks
    • Crosfield Hall location is good for access + proximity to centre
    • Great public transport links to nearby towns/cities
    • Bus station location good access to town
    • Need bus stops somewhere central not necessarily by stream
    • Bus routes to surrounding towns + cities
    • Walks
    • Walking
    • Being able to walk everywhere
    • ‘Real’ centre: defined centre, good facilities, friendly community feeling
    • Parks + walking
    • Transport links
    • Wisdom House/Labyrinth
    • King John’s Garden
    • Safe environment for families
    • Deli cafes
    • Food/pubs
    • Centre of town easily walkable/flat
    • New area in centre (used to be roundabout)
    • Mill stream and Memorial Park
    • Parks
    • Park and access to river Test
    • Waterways
    • Flowers
    • People
    • Waitrose
    • Shops
    • Independent shops
    • Good variety of shops
    • Compact - easy to get around__
    • Scale
    • Street events; Beggars Fair, Food Festival
    • Abbey
    • Old
    • Market town
    • Free parking after 6pm
    • Romsey Show
    • Romsey Rapids
    • Safe and family-friendly
    • Different areas to walk along river/canal
    • Lovely community feeling
    • Public transport
    • Good transport links
    • Schools easily accessible
    • Generally quiet, peaceful
    • Bradbeers and variety of shops
    • Pubs
    • Shopping area
    • Good range of local shops
    • Love being able to walk to all the local shops
    • Quaint streets and buildings
    • Romsey Abbey
    • Historic character
    • River Test
    • Merer Way Fields
    • Memorial Park
    • Lovely Abbey and parks
    • Easy access to the countryside on foot or by bike
    • An excellent leisure centre, bus station and youth centre
    • Activities good - town hall
    • Lots to do for all ages
    • The market
    • A good range of pubs and coffee shops
    • Lots of individual shops of different types
    • Train station with regular trains to nearby towns
    • Romsey Old Cadets
    • Good sport facilities
    • Great amenities - plaza, hilliers
    • Community spirit - family friendly
    • Romsey Abbey
    • Schools fantastic - give children lots of opportunities
    • Open spaces - lots of great conservation areas
    • Excellent range of activities for the retired
    • Closeness to nature
    • Good cycling routes
    • The town centre
    • Neighbours “taxi” service
    • Great events - lantern parade, market, Mayor’s Picnic, murder mystery (Crosfield Hall)
    • Carnival and Beggars Fair
    • Sense of community
    • Green spaces
    • Countryside
    • Memorial Park
    • Diverse mix of green spaces and high street
    • Free parking after 4pm and weekends
    • Main high street is good
    • Safe
    • Not enough parking
    • Overall appearance
    • Traffic congestion
    • Tiny/difficult parking
    • Location of toilets
    • Poor signage for parking (smaller car park)
    • Dominated by flats, recycling bins, antisocial activities, rubbish in stream
    • Back of shops don’t look presentable
    • Amount of green spaces
    • Back of manned police station
    • Traffic (wider area)
    • Bad brewery site (wider area)
    • Can we consolidate the two smaller car parks?
    • Key entry points to the north - under railway bridge
    • Traffic flows around town centre
    • Town approaches have traffic problems
    • Bottle neck when m/way closed
    • Tidy up the bypass vegetation
    • Footpath along the bypass needs urgent repairs
    • Crosfield
    • Flats near Crosfield Hall - appearance
    • Car parking can be difficult + likely to become worse with more development
    • Pavements not improved - shared spaces!
    • Expensive place to shop for clothes etc.
    • Range of shops
    • Too many charity shops
    • Need for middle range shop - M S Food or Sainsbury’s Local?
    • Sitting outside in centre - breathing exhaust fumes
    • Traffic in Romsey centre
    • Hard to cycle safely into town
    • Needs cycle routes to Wellow etc
    • Appearance/maintenance
    • Traffic
    • Expensive shopping/range of shops
    • Public transport
    • Strain on health services
    • Not enough adult education stuff
    • Too much traffic in town centre
    • Lack of diversity
    • Abbey not integrated into town
    • Not enough electric car charging points
    • Not enough facilities for the youth of Romsey
    • Not enough arts, culture, + corresponding creative energy
    • No changing spaces for disabled persons
    • Can only pay by cash at car park meters
    • Parking
    • Not enough resident parking in Broadwater Estate (Banning Street)
    • Parking for large cars
    • Car park spaces are too small and awkward
    • Vacant Brewery site since 1989
    • Brewery site not developed
    • Flats on Broadwater Rd
    • Charity shops
    • Too many charity shops
    • Cafes
    • Coffee shops - too many
    • Lack of housing for single people
    • Cycle access
    • Walking + cycling infrastructure - not enough
    • Hidden waterways
    • Not enough access to stream
    • Getting too big - too many houses being built__
    • Overgrown cycle paths
    • Not enough cycle routes
    • No buses after 10.30 - no taxis
    • The canal is a state - too overgrown
    • Too many care homes
    • No lighting along canal
    • Broken paving stones
    • Expensive to live in
    • Too many estate agents and hairdressers
    • Not enough variety of shops
    • More variety of shops - places to eat
    • Not enough disabled parking on market days
    • Overstretched doctors
    • Congestion into Waitrose car park
    • Lorries unloading back of Boots - not great for disabled parking
    • Low bridges causing traffic problems
    • Traffic in The Hundred
    • More help for deprived people in the town - e.g. struggling young families or the isolated elderly
    • Lack of parking
    • Empty shops
    • Dangerous kerbs in shopping streets. Falls common due to changes in pavement level
    • Roads and through traffic
    • No taxi rank e.g. taxi service has to be pre-arranged, no emergency taxi available
    • Over development around the Abbotswood area
    • The development around Palmerston Statue
    • Too many real estate agencies
    • Excessive building
    • More shops would be useful to fit age ranges
    • More local employment would be good
    • Canal path good but could now include central waters
    • More job opportunities for all ages (16+)
    • Poor transport infrastructure
    • Traffic congestion__
    • Too many car parks
    • Too many traffic wardens
    • Financial constraints - closure of so many small independent businesses
    • Too many charity shops
    • Poor connection between railway station, Plaza, Crosfield Hall etc to centre
    • You never know where the 66 is gonna go
    • No pavement in Newmarket Place

    Assembly members created long lists at their tables of outcomes they would like to see under the themes of Planet, Business, CommunityandPeople. This work was informed by the presentations delivered by speakers over Days 1 and 2 of the Citizens' Assembly.

    The final session on Day 2 involved assembly members roaming around the room and adding comments, thoughts and symbols to the 12 outcomes for each theme which were laid out on tables on large ‘graffiti walls'. The 4 graffiti walls were then given to 4 groups of assembly members to work on and refine the long lists of priorities into 3 priority outcomes per theme. This resulted in a combined set of 12 priority outcomes developed by assembly members. You can see the results of this work in the tables below.

    Table 4: Outcome for Romsey Town Centre statements (3 priority outcomes in each list in bold)

    PLANET BUSINESS
    • Roof gardens and beehives
    • Improved designed waterways (redeveloped) as a tourist feature
    • Urban greening - growing plants on buildings
    • Green city - incorporating waterways and urban habitat such as pollinator plants
    • Make feature of the Fishlake and Tadburn streams
    • Disabled access - more accessible town for all people inc. those with low mobility
    • Romsey has greener access in and out of the town
    • Charge points for electric vehicles
    • Reducing the need to drive into town from outskirts - cycle paths and accessible routes
    • Selling produce from green space e.g. beehives selling honey
    • Better connectivity
    • Better flow of people
    • More emphasis on pedestrians
    • Pedestrianising the town centre will reduce pollution
    • Need mem.park and green spaces in the town
    • Waterway enhanced
    • Encourage use of renewable energy make more sustainable
    • Water turbines generating energy
    • More wildlife in town
    • Greener spaces to attract wildlife
    • More trees and natural planting with consideration to wildlife
    • Centralised delivery pods, i.e. central, Abbottswood, Fishlake, Industrial estate
    • Improve access to waterways
    • Possibility of pedestrianisation of The Hundred and Latimer Street
    • Low carbon footprint (solar panels, efficient energy systems, less concrete)
    • Green trails
    • Sustainable resources
    • Encourage biodiversity
    • Access to nature
    • Ease of movement including accessibility
    • Green trails to encourage people to move around green spaces (similar to heritage trail)
    • Greener spaces to attract more wildlife in town
    • Leaving mature trees and adding special which benefit wildlife
    • Coped with increase to population with careful planning with the wildlife team
    • Being recognised for our efforts to protecting wildlife
    • National Park status?
    • 1st market town national park?
    • Make more of nature we have the birds murmuring
    • Greener spaces in town centre linked by wildlife corridors
    • An obvious increase of species that previously were endangered
    • Plant trees in all streets with planters full of plants for wildlife
    • Clean up canal
    • Buildings with roof gardens
    • Bins can be decorated to bring attention to recycling
    • Pedestrian only in the centre
    • Small areas like the St John’s House Garden
    • Make the canal more attractive to people and wildlife
    • Cleaner water and air. Less traffic pollution
    • Businesses like McDonald’s which cause litter take more responsibility to keep the town clean
    • More on-street recycling bins and split recycling bins
    • Slate of measures to increase and support wildlife including becoming first market town national park
    • Promote sustainable energy throughout town e.g. with solar panels on every shop
    • Help Crosfield Hall generate and store its own energy
    • Green areas which engage young people - community gardens
    • Planters, hanging baskets, green walls, sensory garden
    • Incorporate green space
    • Improve transport links - park and ride
    • If we limit no. of car parks in town need to ensure we have increase in blue badge spaces in town
    • Plants for pollinators - wildlife/habitats in town centre
    • Fewer car journeys and better air quality
    • Green corridors (and blue ones too!)
    • The town is part of the landscape - nature, wildlife, history
    • Understanding how waterways and footpaths connect
    • Plants for pollinators everywhere
    • Suitable habitats in centre without intrusion
    • Wild areas to encourage pollinating insects
    • Develop central stream as attractive area with wildlife
    • Plant wild flowers etc on stream and roundabouts
    • More trees around Romsey
    • Requirement of solar panels or other sustainable energy
    • Wildlife gardening
    • Resilient to weather events (planning for)
    • Fewer cars in centre/more reliance on public transport
    • Reduced number of car journeys
    • Sharing transport
    • Environmental incentives for businesses/developments in Romsey?
    • Carbon neutral development
    • Cowheel scheme - less traffic in town
    • Greener spaces - green walls, planters, plant trees to absorb trees
    • More green spaces behind Duke’s Mill
    • Community farming to produce Romsey fruit and veg distributed without lorries and provides healthy food
    • Good community spaces - education and technology based
    • Quality not quantity of choice of shops to keep character in Romsey
    • Better shops in Dukes Mill
    • Good community spaces - indoor and outdoor for all ages and interests
    • Incorporating education/tourist info into town (of nature, of history)
    • Important to retain the character to bring people into the town
    • More independent shops for a personal feel
    • Retain character and independent shops to bring people in
    • Well planned, designed infrastructure to town
    • More connected town centre - better flow and continuity
    • Improve traffic flow around town to car parks
    • Town centre shopping area inclusive and joined up
    • Linear short stay and disabled parking close to town centre
    • Designed town centre routes which reduce traffic/improve flow, improve accessibility, improved cycling and encourage electric vehicles
    • Two tier parking on outskirts of town with good pedestrian/signed route
    • 5G broadband
    • Plaza De Romsey - European cafe style canopies/covered areas
    • Attractive diverse shops/flexible units
    • Trendy shops for the young
    • Make more of hidden/existing assets
    • Conflict technology/green space - and encouraging night time economy
    • Diverse businesses
    • Diverse retail offering
    • Variety of different shops and services
    • Start-up units under 500 m/sq
    • Incubator space
    • Business start-up pods under Test Valley
    • Venue that attracts people to town in a wider time window (versatile space)
    • Keep it local - Romsey £
    • Greater choice of convenience shops needed
    • A versatile venue that attracts people to town for a wider time window
    • Start up spaces under 500 m/sq
    • More small businesses
    • More independent shops
    • Something to happen in town between 1700 and 2200 - restaurant, other?
    • Longer opening hours and more open Sundays to bring people in
    • Proper restaurants providing food all day and evening
    • More celebrations/street parties/festivals/parades
    • Continental style shopping hours closed at lunch, later opening
    • Huge canopy over Romsey so weather doesn’t affect activities shopping etc.
    • Build an environmentally friendly shopping centre in Romsey
    • Wider variety of businesses providing jobs and services
    • Get more involved in community projects and activities
    • Visit the town without frustration
    • Being more eco-friendly
    • Businesses which complement those on The Hundred/centre
    • Businesses for all age ranges
    • Retain historic architecture shop fronts and signage
    • Busy high street, no vacant shops, high employment across age groups
    • Thriving and diverse
    • Connectivity and flow, walking, cars, pedestrians
    • Growing our rep as a ‘destination’
    • Possible provision of a business centre for out of office work
    • Work centre
    • Larger units for retail
    • Sustainable solutions built in
    • Provision of smaller units
    • Evening economy
    • Recreational businesses
    • Increase arts - gallery, music
    • People connections to make it all work!
    • Cycle shop covering repairs and perhaps home visits - community service
    • Better access for disabled
    • Easy access to car parking
    • Connected transport options
    • A town that is connected to itself and neighbouring areas and nearby cities
    • Full occupancy of business units (with waiting list!)
    • Limit speed of traffic through town
    • Smooth flows of movement - sharing road space well and knowing routes
    • People circulate easily
    • Indoor market - supports local producers/business in town and country
    • Making Crosfield Hall a multi-functional space
    • Crosfield Hall multipurpose facility - sports hall, performance space, meeting point
    • Preserve, enhance and make lively the high street
    • Stimulate a night time economy - restaurants, later shopping hours, events
    • Signs telling you what car parks have spaces and how many
    • Electric cars/buggies and plug in places (charging points)
    • Carbon neutral development
    • Good independent shops
    • Sensible infrastructure
    • Next Romsey development to show the way to rest of the country on high street shopping
    • No/few vacant units
    • Pedestrianise The Hundred to increase footfall in town centre
    • To preserve a sustainable compact town centre
    • Discovery centre winchester - multi-use public building with retractable seating
    • Built in seating in Crosfield Hall

    Table 5: Outcome for Romsey Town Centre statements (3 priority outcomes in each list in bold)

    COMMUNITY PEOPLE 
    • Social hub - Crosfield - can it be redesigned?
    • New hall - include hub open all the time
    • A ‘new’ Crosfield Hall that is larger with better facilities for multiple groups and events
    • Modern town but keep the historical part as the main feature - make more of historical features
    • A central information hub for everyone ‘physical and digital’?
    • Need to address alternative transport links and modes in Romsey e.g. golf buggies
    • Park and ride - mini-bus - disabled park space
    • Making Crosfield Hall a communal space
    • Community that cares and looks out for each other
    • Toddler groups mixed in with older people
    • Getting schools in the local area to get involved in community projects - having a communal garden
    • Making a rentable sports facility is this an option for Crosfield Hall?
    • Somewhere for people who work from home to connect
    • Good community hub/space
    • Community app for Romsey downloadable from car parks to allow visitors to explore
    • Spaces for community groups
    • Next door app
    • Facebook page
    • Planning for new residents to access town centre
    • Building on what we’ve already got
    • Check signage - does it help walkers get to town and explore?
    • Eat out - Eat Well (affordable) programme
    • Database to support community activity
    • Develop community leadership strategy to bring forward and support new community initiatives
    • Develop existing buildings or spaces e.g. save our spaces
    • A community in which nobody feels excluded
    • Successful intergenerational projects
    • A successful night time economy allowing people to enjoy Romsey
    • Safe social areas
    • Clean environment
    • Enough room for all community meetings
    • Attracting tourism to the town
    • Better cycle routes
    • Central accessible community hall space with flexible interior space advertised outside for all ages
    • Lots of things to attract people into the town centre that are affordable for all
    • Green roof on Crosfield Hall
    • A space on top on top of the new Hall - with plants (not too high, but a flat roof using the space for a roof garden)
    • Change the size of the Hall for its use; adapt the room/hall size
    • Crosfield Hall - make a more adaptable resource with the right capacity overall and each room
    • Something to be proud of
    • Chickens - good at giving people a purpose, comforting, a community chicken coop
    • Animals - petting area
    • Community orchard (a mini-orchard)
    • Canopies - protect from rain/shade in summer - for outdoor areas
    • Covered area with seating with shops and facilities around edges e.g. a meeting place
    • Places for events e.g. the hall
    • Green walls on the flats
    • Flowers throughout the year - flowering; low maintenance, bee-friendly plants
    • To get to the underlying issue - what are the reasons for deprivation/poverty. Success = more inclusive community
    • Smart lighting
    • Safe spaces
    • Feel safe
    • Volunteering
    • Thriving and healthy community which transcends generations
    • Involvement in community
    • Community activities
    • Provision for meetings, exercising
    • ‘Proper’ community hub
    • Community spaces for gathering
    • Crosfield Hall developed
    • Maintain and develop community spaces to foster greater sense of community
    • People not being isolated
    • More info on what’s available
    • Can we have fairs to enable service users to talk to reps from services in Romsey
    • Ensure that community and help groups are known about locally and are easy to access
    • Clear, co-ordinated, community approaches
    • Involve surrounding areas
    • Young people and elderly people connected to exchange skills
    • Everyone knows what’s going on in the community
    • Community hub and green spaces that bring people together (across generations)
    • Encourage community involvement
    • Community cafe accessible to all allowing different community groups to mix
    • Community outreach for the lonely
    • Improved transport infrastructure to encourage community with viable options for moving around
    • Intergenerational activities to encourage social stimulation
    • Community/business - create spaces for shared use
    • Centre of excellence - attractive and vibrant centre - make Romsey an inclusive town - and be known for it
    • Better signposting /wayfinding for health activities walks/parks not signs but symbols
    • More accessible to everyone to decrease loneliness
    • Go to speak to someone about opportunities that they might be interested in
    • Decrease ignorance over GP usage with social prescribing to decrease the strain on the NHS
    • GPs to provide info on other options rather than just medication
    • Accessible for all individuals - physical, financial, practical
    • Easy and inviting places to walk to encourage wellbeing
    • Better communication about what’s going on/services available
    • Welcoming ‘happy to talk and share’ environment
    • Welcoming town centre for locals and those outside the area
    • Town centre made safer for our small children
    • Community seating to encourage people to stay and socialise
    • People can volunteer to gain recognised experience for future employment
    • Wellbeing drop in centre and community hub linked to social prescribing
    • Residents engaged with each other and proud of their community
    • Support for young mums/especially first timers
    • More support for different family types (e.g. same-sex, diverse, single etc.)
    • More places for the youth to express themselves, engage in activities, gain experience, socialise and look for help
    • Improved public transport - more evening buses, less traffic in town centre
    • Improved transport infrastructure to encourage community and provide viable options for moving around
    • Shared public spaces/natural green spaces
    • Accessible green spaces in Romsey
    • Develop cross educational
    • Interactive social spaces for multiple users
    • Romsey is a co-operative town people sign up as volunteers and get credit on council tax
    • “Romsey Pound” - exchange and co-operation for services and activities
    • Litter picking
    • Formal acknowledgement of Romsey’s commitment and buy in to co-operation e.g. dementia friendly town, disability friendly
    • Mental and physical health awareness for all ages at schools and work
    • Loneliness in the elderly is not an issue in Romsey
    • Develop capacity or new approaches in coping with increasing population
    • Zero unemployment
    • Consider access and facilities to promote walking and health
    • No need for welfare and financial support in addition to benefits
    • Healthy people
    • Healthier citizens preventing disease by good diet and exercise
    • No need for welfare and financial support in addition to benefits
    • More green spaces for events
    • A structure that is not only aesthetically pleasing but is challenging and stimulating something different a feature - use your brain/think about
    • Things to link all the generations - so everyone can enjoy it together
    • Landscaping and green gym
    • Healthier people
    • Pop-up units for shops
    • Health service with multiple levels of access for all demographics that live in Romsey - Primary Care Network, Social Prescribing
    • Essential needs met
    • Easy, prompt access to shared medical services for all
    • New developments bring more medical services (GPs)
    • All demographics represented - young, middle aged, elderly, and all ends of income spectrum
    • Green trail - promote environment, cycling, walking
    • Learn from nature
    • More emphasis on environment
    • Health orientated shops and restaurants etc.
    • Accessibility - accessible shops and businesses
    • Incentives for businesses to be eco/healthy (low rent businesses, loyalty rewards)
    • Park cycle
    • Design in more opportunities for healthy activities

    3.2 Final ballot vote

    Panel members cast votes using their ballot papers on Day 4 of the People's Panel. This allowed them to vote as an individual as to how much they opposed or supported each proposal.

    The question on the ballot papers asked assembly members:

    "To what extent do you support or oppose the following proposals for improving the area around Crosfield Hall and the Bus Station to deliver the maximum benefit to Romsey?".

    All of the priority outcome proposals received strong levels of support overall. 7 of the proposals received over 50% ‘strongly support' votes. The highest level of support was received for ‘attractive, vibrant town - centre of excellence' which received 100% support. 8 proposals received some levels of opposition with ‘reduce vehicles by half by 2025' and ‘Green Town status by 2025' receiving the most opposition.

    Chart 3: Results of voting on the proposals for improving the area - 42 ballot papers were received and counted

    Chart 3: Results of voting on the proposals for improving the area - 42 ballot papers were received and counted

    3.3 Recommendations

    This section shows the priority outcome proposals that received over 50% strongly support votes and the recommendations that the Citizens' Assembly presented to the council. Using the data from ‘why these are important to me' discussions, assembly members worked on tables to prepare their final recommendations in the form of a presentation to the council.

    1. Make Romsey an attractive, vibrant town, a centre of excellence, including green spaces and wildlife corridors

    Key messages presented to council:

    What actions need to happen to make it real?

    1. Improve road layout to accommodate pedestrians and cyclists - make it more attractive
    2. Use current Crosfield site for parking and buses
    3. Examine feasibility of moving Crosfield Hall to bus station site/other site
    4. Enhance passageways
    5. Improve signage and include historical information
    6. Create more green spaces and access to waterways (e.g. Kings Cross)

    Who needs to be involved? What resources are needed? 
    • TVBC, local schools, colleges
    • Local businesses/residents
    • User groups
    • Bus companies
    • Environmental agencies
    • Local press
    • Local groups/communities
    • Funding - grants
    • Community involvement
    • Planners, architects, developers
    • Environmental advisers
    • Champion of project

    What impact will it have?

    Positive Negative 
    • Encourage visitors, wildlife and biodiversity
    • Cleaner air
    • Resilient ecosystems
    • Raise profile of Romsey
    • Encourage environmentally friendly businesses
    • Less parking
    • More people (+ -)
    • Loss of Crosfield memories

    What is success? What might constrain it? 
    • Romsey is a pleasant environment for everybody
    • Increased tourism
    • Thriving local businesses
    • More hedgehogs
    • Lack of support
    • Fear of change
    • Lack of finance

    Timeline - how long will it need?

    PeriodActions

    6 months

    • Have a plan, comms strategy
    • Traffic management scheme
    • Planting improved
    • Passageways improved
    • Feasibility study planned

    1-2 years

    • Dukes Mill + square improved
    • Stream access improved
    • Work started

    2-5 years

    • New traffic scheme in place
    • Changes to Crosfield/bus station (possible swap) is achieved

    2. Improved transport infrastructure to encourage a sense of community - with viable options for moving around

    Key messages presented to council:

    Currently:

    Will most improve because:

    In 5 years' time:

    More people will mean a wider range of business to thrive."

    What actions need to happen to make it real?

    1. Planning: feasibility study, demand study, full costing
    2. Inclusive flexible transport options e.g. electric car club (+vans, buggie, bikes), community taxis, dial-a-ride, small, free shuttle buses
    3. Designated cycleways and walkways with traffic separation - clearly signposted, connected, access to key destinations
    4. Close The Hundred to traffic at certain times (trial period) and mitigate impact on surrounding areas
    5. Create transport interchange (buses/taxis) linked to community hub
    6. Shuttle buses linking key destinations incl. Railway station, The Rapids, town centre

    Who needs to be involved? What resources are needed? 
    • Residents and community groups
    • Experts
    • Transport providers
    • Councils and government/local authorities
    • Business
    • Landowners
    • Investors
    • Funding
    • Expert advice
    • Public support
    • Communications strategy

    What impact will it have?

    Positive Negative 
    • Reduced congestion
    • Improved air quality
    • Health benefits
    • Better access for all - inclusivity
    • More visitors
    • Nicer place to live, work and visit
    • Reduced access for residents in town centre
    • People might choose to go elsewhere
    • Disruption of deliveries

    What is success? What might constrain it? 
    • [no comments]
    • Lack of funding
    • Existing road network
    • Resistance to change

    Timeline - how long will it need?

    PeriodAction

    1 year

    Study

    3. Lots of things to attract people into the town centre that are affordable and accessible for all which everyone living in Romsey knows about and can take part in

    Key messages presented to council:

    "It will make people feel: included and involved, diverse and inclusive, connected, community feeling, responsible and proud of our town, supported by each other and for that to happen; activities need to be affordable and accessible.

    This will improve Romsey because the more variety of people we can bring into the town, the more businesses and variety of businesses will thrive in the town. It is about people wanting to live here, to stay here; for leisure, shopping and as a happy, pleasant place to live. It is vital for employment and will improve people's health and wellbeing.

    It will bring people of all ages together and people from all walks of life and promote understanding between different age groups (younger and older people). People will not be excluded because of affordability. It will give young people things to do and it will create opportunities for personal development and education. Activities and events that are affordable and accessible will bring people together - daytime and evening. It will promote an evening economy."

    What actions need to happen to make it real?

    1. Research needs
    2. Central, accessible, flexible community hub for all ages and incomes
    3. Multimedia communication platform
    4. Improve night time economy
    5. Improve and enhance existing waterways and footpaths/pavements/high traffic areas in and around the town
    6. Employ a wide range of incentives to draw people into the town (Romsey Loyalty Card)

    Who needs to be involved?What resources are needed?
    • Councils
    • Residents/community groups
    • Schools/colleges
    • Transport organisations
    • Romsey Future
    • Businesses
    • Outlying parish councils
    • Urban planners
    • Volunteers
    • Funding
    • Advertising
    • Planning
    • Volunteers
    • Signposting
    • Loyalty card adoption

    What impact will it have?

    PositiveNegative
    • Romsey becomes a shining example for the nation
    • A happier town
    • Positive social networking
    • Supports local economy
    • Increased community collegency
    • Congested and crowded
    • Temporary disruptions
    • Not enough parking
    • Some businesses may benefit - others less so

    What is success? What might constrain it? 
    • More footfall
    • More employment opportunities
    • Local sense of pride in the town
    • More community involvement
    • Achieving the maintenance of Romsey’s historic character
    • Public negativity
    • Existing infrastructure
    • Lack of funding and manpower

    Timeline - how long will it need?

    ActionPeriod

    6 months

    [no comments]

    1-2 years

    Design

    4. In Romsey there will be more green spaces in the town area that will protect enhance and increase our natural environment, which includes the wild animals and plants

    Key messages presented to council:

    "We think that this proposal will improve wildlife conditions, health and wellbeing of citizens, help reduce the effects of climate change and focus on future generations. Many of you say that these things will improve your feelings about Romsey and your overall health.

    The area will improve because the stuff we want to do is: survey what we have, to create a plan for the future, link wildlife corridors, make Fishlake Stream accessible, only use wildlife friendly planting and involve communities in our urban greening projects.

    In 2024, living in Romsey will make us proud, we will be shopping local, we're going to be staying here, living with lots of plants and animals in our space. We're going to be better connected to our rural settings and our house will increase in value. We are the future! Thank you."

    What actions need to happen to make it real?

    1. Survey existing flora and fauna and create a policy for the future
    2. Enhance and link existing corridors, for wildlife and people
    3. Make Fishlake Stream accessible by opening up the bank
    4. Use wildlife friendly planting
    5. Involve community in creating and maintaining green spaces
    6. Encourage and implement urban greening

    Who needs to be involved? What resources are needed? 
    • Local and national government
    • Schools/young people
    • Community
    • Experts (conservation, environmental)
    • Press and media
    • Ambassador - Charlie Dimmock, Chris Pacham
    • Money! E.g. grants
    • Business sponsorship
    • Knowledge experts
    • Alternative energy
    • Bags of happiness
    • Rewards system for green activities
    • Space/land

    What impact will it have?

    Positive Negative 
    • Happiness
    • Civic pride
    • Increased wildlife
    • Positive impact on planet
    • Intergenerational
    • Inclusive
    • Disruption
    • Lack of maintenance
    • Ruining environment

    What is success? What might constrain it? 
    • Better health
    • Spaces used and enjoyed
    • Increased tourism
    • Increased wildlife
    • Poor planning
    • Lack of commitment
    • Cost of maintenance
    • Public apathy

    Timeline - how long will it need?

    PeriodActions

    6 months

    • Survey existing spaces
    • Identify new opps.
    • Communicate

    1-2 years

    • Improve Fishlake Stream
    • Improve passageways
    • Create family events for greening

    2-5 years

    • Green walls and roofs on
    • Maintain what we have
    • Create educational programmes

    5. Community hub and green spaces that bring people together (across generations)

    Key messages presented to council:

    What actions need to happen to make it real?

    1. Decide on the purpose of the community hub: multifunctional, intergenerational activities, community and business
    2. Decide on the location and design of community hub/business hub
    3. Identify resources available/seek funding
    4. Identify stakeholders/users/market for commercial users
    5. Communication strategy and plan
    6. Consider in line with other master planning initiatives
    7. Understand existing and future uses of the hub

    Who needs to be involved? What resources are needed? 
    • Local authorities and regulatory
    • Local community across the age groups - e.g. schools/elderly - including villages
    • Local media
    • Professional advisers/experts
    • Local businesses
    • Volunteer agencies
    • Money! Grants, funding, loans
    • Experts, sharing best practice
    • Communication strategy
    • Developer/local authority support
    • Land
    • Community engagement

    What impact will it have?

    Positive Negative 
    • Increased community engagement, reduced social isolation
    • Improved wellbeing
    • Improved appearance of town - better utilised space and environment
    • Better support for business, opportunities for start-ups
    • Disturbing peace - whilst building
    • Anti-social behaviour
    • Increased pressure on parking and traffic

    What is success? What might constrain it? 
    • Well used by wide range of people
    • Well designed, practical and versatile building in-keeping with surroundings
    • Increased prosperity and job opportunities
    • Lack of available flexible space
    • Parking facilities/congestion
    • Public apathy/opposed to change
    • Funding restrictions
    • Planning constraints

    Timeline - how long will it need?

    PeriodAction

    6 months

    Getting community engaged from start - where, what etc.

    1-2 years

    • Design and gain permission for planning
    • Identify funding

    Longer term

    [no comments]

    6. Design the transport and parking with an integrated plan that includes walking, cycling, public transport and cars and think about all the different kinds of people coming into the town (parking, accessible, but still encourage bus use, especially by younger people)

    Key messages presented to council:

    "Many people want to walk and cycle safely as part of a healthy lifestyle. It will deliver greater accessibility for all particularly families, people with disabilities, elderly people and young people.

    It will reduce our dependence on cars, reducing congestion and improving air quality. More active lifestyles make people feel happier as well as healthier. It widens life for low-income families and helps people get out and about.

    Improved road safety, enhances the quality of life and makes life easier. Improves traffic flow, brings more people in to Romsey, to boost the local economy.

    It will generate demand for greener modes of transport and increases access to employment options, particularly for young people."

    What actions need to happen to make it real?

    1. Undertake full traffic impact assessment of travel plan for town centre and villages
    2. Enhance pedestrian pathways to town centres
    3. Design cycle routes that link Romsey with outlying villages and Southampton
    4. Limit access to town centre for cars/deliveries
    5. Space required for buses to drop-off/pick-up/turning - not parking
    6. Provision of car parking (investigate park and stride)

    Who needs to be involved? What resources are needed? 
    • Local residents/community - incl. diverse groups
    • Local businesses
    • Local authorities
    • Transport companies - bus, taxi, train
    • Lobby groups, FOE etc.
    • Local media
    • Romsey Future
    • Finance
    • Commitment
    • Good transport plan and design - right people doing it
    • Good communications/marketing
    • Buy-in from residents

    What impact will it have?

    Positive Negative 
    • Improved town centre offering and economy
    • Less pollution, less traffic
    • Healthier lifestyle
    • Too successful (infrastructure cannot cope)

    What is success? What might constrain it? 
    • Improved inclusivity / accessibility
    • More appealing town, bringing in more visitors, employment and economic benefit
    • Improved transport network with safer pedestrian and cycle routes
    • Lack of investment, commitment of resources
    • Lack of local support/negative attitude to change
    • Geography, location, heritage

    Timeline - how long will it need?

    ActionPeriod

    6 months

    [no comments]

    2-5 years

    [no comments]

    Longer term

    [no comments]

    7. Well planned, connected accessible infrastructure (including travel, access, public spaces, education, tech and business) with good flow for transport and pedestrians to encourage business and tourists

    Key messages presented to council:

    "A revived Crosfield Hall in an appropriate location - a flexible and functional community hall and facilities (bus station and toilets) would provide a central-focus for visitors and residents alike.

    We think that this would reduce congestion allowing us to move more efficiently and more safely both in cars, cycles and on foot.

    Improve footfall and access to Romsey which will in turn improve the economy, job opportunities and tourism."

    What actions need to happen to make it real?

    1. Replace or adapt Crosfield Hall with something fit for purpose (or move)
    2. Flexible, easy-in, easy-out business spaces for new and dynamic businesses and community linked to it
    3. Improvement of public toilets (internal and external)
    4. Bus station - do we need a bus station? Improve or move it?

    Connecting south/centre and improving flow and signage for navigating

    Who needs to be involved?What resources are needed? 
    • Current users of Crosfield and bus services (consult them)
    • Architects and planners
    • Local businesses
    • Chamber of Commerce
    • Developers
    • Urban planners
    • Funding
    • Experts
    • Urban furniture (bus stops/benches etc.)
    • Marketing/comms

    What impact will it have?

    PositiveNegative 
    • More attractive space leading to greater civic pride
    • Bring more visitors into the town
    • Improved facilities and opportunities for community groups
    • If bus station is moved, access might be more difficult
    • Temporary disruption to services/facilities

    What is success? What might constrain it?
    • Public buy-in
    • Spaces that are well connected and well used
    • Spaces fit for purpose
    • TPO and planning laws
    • Listed buildings and archaeology
    • Disruption
    • Getting local consensus
    • Local land owners

    Timeline - how long will it need?

    PeriodActions

    6 months

    Phasing to maintain facilities and infrastructure

    2-5 years

    Completed

    Longer term

    [no comments]

    4. What did the assembly members think?

    The work of the Citizens' Assembly is being evaluated by Renaisi as part of the wider evaluation of the Innovation in Democracy Programme. The full evaluation report will be made available when it is published before the end of March 2020.

    Renaisi provided questionnaires13 for assembly members to complete at the beginning of the Citizens' Assembly's first weekend, the end of the first weekend and at the end of the second weekend. The information will be used to provide a full evaluation of all three of the Innovation in Democracy Programme citizens' assemblies early in 2020. The following is a snapshot of the survey data in relation to the recommendations.

    Chart 4: Question: ‘I agreed with the recommendations put forward to Test Valley Borough Council'

    Question: How did you feel about the recommendations reached by the assembly?

    Email feedback from an assembly member

    "Good afternoon,

    I just wanted to say that, although it may have been hard work, it didn't really feel like it thanks largely to the way it was organised and managed.

    It is difficult to overstate how impressed a lot of us were with all the effort you and your colleagues put into making both weekends run smoothly (tech problems aside!) so thank you all.

    All best,

    Tim"

    _

    _

    Annexes

    Annex 1: discussion maps from resident workshops and bus user survey

    Annex 2: ‘why' the 7 priority outcome proposals are important: messages to test valley borough council

    Feedback on why the recommendations are important to individuals

    After voting, table groups discussed the reasons whythe top 7 proposals for Romsey Town Centre were important to them as individuals. The following is the typed notes in the Citizens' Assembly's own words on why the top 7 proposals would make an impact in their own lives. They are typed in no particular order or grouping.

    Lots of things to attract people into the town centre that are affordable and accessible for all which everyone living in Romsey knows about and can take part in - Why this is important to me

    Make Romsey an attractive, vibrant town, a centre of excellence, including green spaces and wildlife corridors - Why this is important to me

    Community hub and green spaces that bring people together (across generations) - Why this is important to me

    Well planned, connected accessible infrastructure (including travel, access, public spaces, education, tech and business) with good flow for transport and pedestrians to encourage business and tourists - Why this is important to me

    Design the transport and parking with an integrated plan that includes walking, cycling, public transport and cars and think about all the different kinds of people coming into the town (parking, accessible, but still encourage bus use, especially by younger people) - Why this is important to me

    Improved transport infrastructure to encourage a sense of community - with viable options for moving around - Why this is important to me

    In Romsey there will be more green spaces in the town area that will enhance, protect and increase our natural environment, which includes the wild animals and plants - Why this is important to me

    Annex 3: the 5 priority success proposals that did not get presented to the council

    These proposals still form part of the recommendations but did not receive over 50% ‘strongly support' votes so they were not worked on at the end of Day 4 in creating recommendations to the council. They still received strong support and will be recognised as such.

    In Romsey we will reduce the number of vehicles in the town centre by half by 2025

    What actions need to happen to make it real?

    1. Out of town park and ride with transport/shuttle into town
    2. Partial pedestrianisation of The Hundred (10-4) and investigate further pedestrianisation
    3. Improve cycle routes and safe places to store bikes
    4. Improve walking access
    5. Weight limit on through traffic
    6. Improve public transport links - stops, frequency, routes, number of buses
    7. Address parking spaces in town centre
    8. Marketing/comms
    9. Research traffic and movement in town centre
    10. Bus station/interchange - have something in the centre

    Who needs to be involved?

    What resources are needed?

    What impact will it have?

    What might constrain [success]?

    Timeline

    Make healthier living easier - design in more opportunities for healthy activities

    What actions need to happen to make it real?

    1. Improve cycle infrastructure
    2. Green trails and green areas
    3. Community gardens and promote growing own food
    4. Sports facilities - improve existing facilities, affordable/free, welcoming and accessible to all
    5. Wellbeing centre (incorporated into new community centre)
    6. Communication strategy

    Who needs to be involved?

    What resources are needed?

    What impact will it have?

    Positive

    Negative

    What is success?

    What might constrain it?

    Attractive and diverse businesses and shops in flexible units with space for start-ups and local businesses to bring greater variety and more jobs

    What actions need to happen to make it real?

    1. Create a flexible, multi-functional building for community and business use
    2. Create a plaza area by the stream
    3. Develop Dukes Mill into an open space that is welcoming to young people
    4. Make use of the old rugby club to create accessible parking for shoppers and workers
    5. Encouraging people to move around the whole town centre by making access and walkways attractive
    6. Ensure there are facilities for local enterprises - hireable space

    Who needs to be involved?

    What resources are needed?

    What impact will it have?

    Positive

    Negative

    What is success?

    *What might constrain it? *

    Timeline - how long will it need?

    Make Romsey the first truly green historic market town

    *What actions need to happen to make it real? *

    1. Define what we mean by a green market town - independent standard
    2. Green badge scheme to incentivise businesses to go green
    3. Require highest possible energy efficiency standards for: new buildings and renovations of existing buildings
    4. Park and ride with electric (mini) shuttle buses to town centre
    5. Create/improve wildlife corridors and green spaces including waterways
    6. Limited pedestrianisation of The Hundred

    Who needs to be involved?

    *What resources are needed? *

    What impact will it have?

    *Positive *

    Negative

    What is success?

    What might constrain it?

    Timeline - how long will it need?

    In Romsey we achieve ‘Green Town' status by 2025

    What actions need to happen to make it real? 1. Research, develop and agree criteria and standards for green city status (thegreencity.com), sustainable goals 2. Research funding opportunities 3. Communicating the vision 4. Develop themes for standards: waterways, green spaces, biodiversity (flora and fauna), buildings (energy efficiency), traffic and air quality 5. Always recognise we are a historic market town, make more of existing green ‘pit stops'/map them/Green Trail

    Who needs to be involved?

    What resources are needed?

    What impact will it have?

    Positive

    Negative

    What is success?

    What might constrain it?

    Timeline - how long will it need?

    Annex 4: Innovation in Democracy Programme Support & Funding

    The Innovation in Democracy Programme (IiDP) is trialling the involvement of citizens in decision-making at local government level through innovative models of deliberative democracy. It is supporting three local authorities to open up a key policy decision to citizen deliberation, complemented by online engagement. IiDP is jointly delivered by the Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport and the Ministry of Housing, Communities, and Local Government.

    Following an Expression of Interest process, the following local authorities were selected to be part of the Innovation in Democracy Programme:

    Building Capacity, Skills and Learning

    Part of the purpose of the Innovation in Democracy programme is for local authorities to learn about what is involved in putting together a citizens' assembly.

    Test Valley Borough Council applied to be part of the Innovation in Democracy programme in order to further explore how participative and deliberative democracy can add value to, and strengthen, representative democracy. Based on a long term strategic commitment to work in a more place-based and collaborative way with local communities, the council wanted to test how a deliberative process such as a Citizens' Assembly could take the council to the next level in terms of its empowerment of local communities.

    Officers from Test Valley Borough Council therefore worked alongside The Democratic Society in the development of the Romsey Citizens' Assembly. Their involvement in the Citizens' Assembly included:

    Furthermore, Test Valley Borough Council staff were trained in facilitation techniques by Involve ahead of the first citizens' assembly session as part of the Innovation in Democracy Programme's building capacity, skills and learning element. 4 table facilitators were selected to form part of the table facilitation team (2 per weekend). These table facilitators do not work directly on Town Centre policy or strategy.

    Funding

    Each participating area in the Innovation in Democracy Programme has support from the Democracy Support Contractor Consortium made up of Involve, The Democratic Society, mySociety and The RSA, as well as up to £60,000 to cover the costs of implementing citizens' assemblies and online engagement. The programme is being independently evaluated by Renaisi who will publish findings when the programme completes before the end of March 2020. The following is a broad breakdown of how the funds were spent on direct costs. In addition, it shows the breakdown of the £64.5K allocated to the Democracy Support Contractor Consortium.

    Table 18: Breakdown of expenditure

    Item Cost 

    Assembly Member recruitment – invitation package and mail out; recruitment to stratification and initial on-boarding of assembly members

    £9,800

    Assembly Member honorarium travel expenses

    £19,000

    Table facilitation / speakers / team accommodation, travel and subsistence expenses

    £22,436

    Stationery, equipment and printing

    £791

    Venue costs, parking permits

    £6,992

    Direct cost subtotal

    £59,019

    Setup, support design

    £25,980

    Digital strategy support

    £4,680

    Delivery reporting

    £33,840

    Democracy support subtotal

    £64,500

    TOTAL

    £123,519

    Notes


    1:42 citizens completed the full Citizens' Assembly from the original selected 50 individuals

    2:www.testvalley.gov.uk

    3:www.romseyfuture.org.uk

    4:www.demsoc.org

    5:www.sortitionfoundation.org.uk

    6:https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/innovation-in-democracy-programme-launch

    7:http://closeupresearchandfilm.org/

    8:www.involve.org.uk

    9:www.mysociety.org

    10:www.thersa.org

    11:www.renaisi.com

    12:www.coggle.it

    13:42 questionnaires were received